"Barack Obama don't want none unless you got buns, hun. You can do side bends or sit-ups, but please don't lose that butt."But seriously folks. In examples like these, it becomes obvious who got their logic instruction at a Catholic institution. :) The example pointed out is not a true converse.Converse of p->q is q->p. Your statement is more like ~q->r.FYI: I'm just kidding, and the joke was pretty funny.
I actually did debate for a moment if 'conversely' was the right word, but let it slip...thinking it just sounded good, but you're right that's probably not what the great Blackbird Logicians would have said....
"Barack Obama don't want none unless you got buns, hun.
ReplyDeleteYou can do side bends or sit-ups, but please don't lose that butt."
But seriously folks. In examples like these, it becomes obvious who got their logic instruction at a Catholic institution. :)
The example pointed out is not a true converse.
Converse of p->q is q->p. Your statement is more like ~q->r.
FYI: I'm just kidding, and the joke was pretty funny.
I actually did debate for a moment if 'conversely' was the right word, but let it slip...thinking it just sounded good, but you're right that's probably not what the great Blackbird Logicians would have said....
ReplyDelete